Cyfroteka.pl

klikaj i czytaj online

Cyfro
Czytomierz
00307 004777 12615234 na godz. na dobę w sumie
Soft Power in Contemporary International Relations - ebook/pdf
Soft Power in Contemporary International Relations - ebook/pdf
Autor: Liczba stron: 240
Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego Język publikacji: polski
ISBN: 978-83-8088-900-2 Data wydania:
Lektor:
Kategoria: ebooki >> naukowe i akademickie >> politologia
Porównaj ceny (książka, ebook (-19%), audiobook).

Soft power, is not a new phenomenon in a political practice but it may be considered a novelty in the theory of international relations. The concept of soft power reflects the character of changes which took place in international relations when the notion of security was extended to include threats and challenges of non-military character. New threats and challenges require another type of instruments which are identified with soft power to a greater extent.

Marginalising soft power is a consequence of one-dimensional perception of power as belonging to the military domain. lt results from an erroneous conviction that soft power resources i.e. culture, values, norms and a political style do not belong to the category of power.

Furthermore, soft power must not be overrated at the expense of hard power which is identified with military force and economic pressure. Soft power is certainly an important dimension of power and failure to include it in states’ plans may lead to problems with achieving its basic objectives.

Znajdź podobne książki Ostatnio czytane w tej kategorii

Darmowy fragment publikacji:

Robert Łoś – University of Łódź, Faculty of International and Political Studies Department of Theory of Foreign and Security Policy 90-127 Łódź, 41/43 Składowa St. INITIATING EDITOR Agnieszka Kałowska REVIEWER Lubomir Zyblikiewicz TRANSLATION Krystyna Krzemińska PROOFREADING Aleksandra Urzędowska TYPESETTING AGENT PR TECHNICAL EDITOR Leonora Wojciechowska COVER DESIGN Katarzyna Turkowska Cover Image: Traditional handicrafts surroundings Cusco, Peru Photo: Katarzyna Turkowska The publication was financed by the Polish National Science Centre (Decision no. NCN UMO – 2011/01/B/HS5/00678) © Copyright by Robert Łoś, Łódź 2017 © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2017 Published by Łódź University Press First edition. W.07732.16.0.M ISBN 978-83-8088-899-9 e-ISBN 978-83-8088-900-2 Publisher’s sheets 9.0; printing sheets 15.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Chapter 1 Power versus world order 1.1. Contemporary world order 1.2. Power in theoretical approach 1.3. Measures and indicators of power Chapter 2 Resources and instruments of soft power 2.1. Soft and hard power: scope of action 2.1.1. The concept of soft power 2.1.2. Hard power versus soft power 2.1.2.1. Military power versus soft power 2.1.2.2. Economy versus soft power 9 23 25 37 52 63 65 65 74 77 82 5 Table of Contents 87 2.2. Soft power resources 87 2.2.1. Classification of resources 88 2.2.2. Norms and values 94 2.2.3. Culture 101 2.2.3.1. Education 102 2.2.4. Foreign policy 102 2.2.4.1. The scope of the notion 106 2.2.4.2. Legitimization 2.2.4.3. Ability to build a consensus 110 2.2.4.4. Measures and methods of a state’s foreign policy 112 2.2.4.5. The perception of foreign policy operational environment 2.3. New instruments of soft power interaction 2.3.1. Public diplomacy 2.3.2. Cultural diplomacy 2.3.3. National branding 2.4. National institutions and a society 2.4.1. A state’s political regime and soft power 2.4.2. Social conditions of reinforcing soft power 2.5. Instruments of support 2.5.1. Media 2.5.1.1. Communication possibilities and credibility of information 2.5.1.2. A role of contemporary media 2.5.2. Foundations – think tanks Conclusion 115 117 117 126 131 136 136 141 143 143 143 145 149 153 6 Chapter 3 Contemporary power and soft power 3.1. Indicators of a state’s hard power 3.2. Soft power ranking 3.2.1. Selected rankings of soft power 3.2.2. Original ranking of states’ soft power 3.2.2.1. Diplomacy 3.3.2.2. Social-political category 3.3.2.3. Popular and high culture 3.2.2.4. Education and science 3.2.2.5. The social-economic category Conclusion Bibliography Table of Contents 157 159 171 171 175 175 178 183 189 192 203 213 7 INTRODUCTION http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/8088-899-9-01 Soft power is not a new subject in the political practice, howev- er, in the theory of international relations, it may be considered a novelty, popularized thanks to J.S. Nye. The concept is difficult to define: it may as well mean soft authority or power or the third face of authority or power. It is best to refer to it as soft power in order to avoid terminological inconsequences. One of the weaknesses identified by soft power researchers is the inability to conduct full and clear evaluation and division into hard and soft power areas. It is difficult to identify a single defini- tion of this phenomenon, but it can be assumed that soft power is the ability of a state to meet goals thanks to attractiveness of its cul- ture, values, political style void of aggression and pressure, replacing the use of military power or economic pressure. Soft power makes the state attractive to others, enhances impact and encourages other entities to do what is expected from them. It is worth mentioning that the concept of soft power reflects the character of changes that have begun to take place in interna- tional relations. Within this concept shaping of the new international order has meant diminishing role of the military factor and more significant role of soft power resources. At the same time the concept of security has broadened due to new threats and challenges of non- military character, which have also redefined the concept of power. In the changing world order there have appeared threats that states cannot face single-handedly. New threats and challenges re- quire new tools. The tools are related to soft power, thanks to which the participation of a great number of entities and use of resourc- es have ensured a dialogue, cooperation between states, which as 11 Soft Power in Contemporary International Relations a result, could have contributed to providing the sense of security. Having assumed that the role of soft power has grown in impor- tance, it is necessary to determine whether this kind of power is sufficient to build and stabilize the world order. One must assume that soft power has grown in importance since power was spread. However, it is difficult to determine whether it happened due to the influence of soft power or the other way round, the significance of soft power has grown as a result of new tendencies in the process of shaping the world order. Discussing the significance of soft power, one should identify its efficiency and degree of its dependence on typical indicators of pow- er such as the size of a territory and demographic potential and, if so, whether it is connected with a specific cultural background. If soft power operates in various civilisation areas, one must answer the question whether increased importance of soft power is affected by universal values. It is necessary to emphasise the status of a ho- mogeneous culture which, according to research, plays a minor role in the growth of soft power. Its significance may, however, turn out to be greater as it protects the society and its identity from the influ- ence of other nations and states. At present the most powerful states in the world cannot ignore the role of soft power. Nevertheless, the potential of soft power should not be overrated and one should not assume that a state or nations are ready to blindly follow other participants of internation- al relations. On the other hand, it is necessary to assume that culture, norms and values can be found appealing only when the success of a state and its citizens is visible. Therefore, one may risk putting forward a thesis that the influence of soft power may increase when it is 12 Introduction supported by the success of an economic model, attractive lifestyle or wealth of the society. Another important issue is determining whether soft power af- fects the world order on a short-term basis or in an evolutionary manner and, thus, whether it solves global problems such as migra- tion or climatic changes effectively. Assuming confrontation potential among states, one should de- termine whether international entities, having limited soft power resources, are able to compensate for and strengthen their power by using only military and economic tools. Soft power may affect only the soft area of power whereas in the military and economic areas it may appear useless. Equally important is symmetry in the development of indi- vidual soft power categories, which allows to exploit soft poten- tial of resources. Asymmetry in this respect encourages a state to strengthen weaker categories of soft power, which may raise con- cerns among other states that soft power is strengthened by means of propaganda. In this context, by analysing individual categories defining soft power, it is important to determine to what degree states with bal- anced soft power factors are able to increase the growth of its own power. Therefore, efficiency of soft power may involve applying and combining various elements of soft power in a balanced way, turning it into an extremely dynamic process which is difficult to control. As a consequence, one should assume that soft power operates in an active manner (e.g. public diplomacy) and a passive manner (eliminating institutions). Both cases involve interaction which affects other international entities in various ways. In the active 13 Soft Power in Contemporary International Relations interaction tools play a greater role whereas in the passive interac- tion only resources matter. The construction of this work has been determined by the diffi- culties in identifying the range of soft power and its place in general power of a state. That is why, the first chapter presents changes that took place at the turn of the 20th and the 21st centuries in the world order, which altered the way of looking at power resources, mecha- nisms of its creation and the environment of its operation. Another part of the chapter defines power presented by representatives of main streams in international relations. As the subject of power and power status is too broad, this chapter focuses only on the most important problems which are necessary to formulate theses connected with the categories that may be useful to determine soft power. The final sub-chapter shows operating indicators and models determining power. Selected definitions and formulas, quoted by the author, are aimed at defining the place of soft power in the over- all power status of the state. Another chapter defines the role and potential of hard and soft power interaction, mutual connections between their resources and interaction tools. This part of the chapter is aimed at defining soft power, showing its borders and ability to create ‘soft’ influence by means of resources traditionally attributed to hard power. Determining the degree and dependence related to hard power resources is extremely important as they, to a great extent, allow to determine the degree of functioning of its soft elements. The next important step is classification of soft power resources, starting with the values that determine many other types of behav- iour. The values are not only those referred to as political ones, but also norms which allow self-determination and acceptance of other norms and values on the basis of co-optation. 14 Introduction Further on one should take into account high culture, popular culture and education. These elements, to a great degree, protect from influence and have actual attraction aspect. Naturally, the preferred style of foreign policy, its resources and methods including the ability to determine its functioning once the state’s actions have been legitimized by the international com- munity, belong to soft power resources. Only these foreign policy actions are acceptable and may generate soft power. Equally important are abilities and functioning on the basis of consensus. It requires new instruments to create soft power by means of public diplomacy, cultural diplomacy and national brand- ing. However, it is difficult to determine borders between these cat- egories as supporters of each believe that their method of research into influence should be considered as the most appropriate and superior. In case of soft power it is necessary to consider public diplomacy as an instrument of operation strategy, which in cultural diplo- macy is limited to culture. Therefore, it must be assumed that it is the instrument of influence within the scope of soft power interac- tion. The concept of national branding refers to building the brand of the state, which influences its image. Further considerations on the substance of soft power require determining how state mechanisms connected with state institu- tions can support or prevent soft power operations. This is the rea- son why it is so important to take into consideration and determine the efficiency of democracy and authoritarian governments. More difficult to demonstrate is the mechanism of support for the soft power created by the society and self-identification of the commu- nity which is able to strengthen soft power resources. The ability of soft power to interact is also related to well-operating mechanism, 15 Soft Power in Contemporary International Relations communication and media used in this process. Defining the poten- tial of media and think tanks as elements of support in this respect, is important to generate soft power. The first two chapters are aimed at demonstrating mechanisms of generating, functioning and interaction of power including soft power whereas another chapter focuses on demonstrating its poten- tial by referring to measurable indicators defining the scale of gener- ated power. In the first sub-chapter indicators necessary to determine the power of a state have been presented. It includes indicators re- lated to demographic and territorial potential, military forces and economy. These indicators may not fully reflect military and eco- nomic power of states but it is not the author’s intention to position states in terms of hard power but only to demonstrate the potential of thirty individual states. The most important part of the third chapter is a separate origi- nal index based on a number of evaluation categories. The first cat- egory is diplomacy which includes indicators related to foreign pol- icy, public diplomacy, cultural and digital diplomacy. This category takes into account participation of a state in international organisa- tions as they are able to determine the scope of influence through participation and operation on the broader cooperation arena. Representatives of a state can interact in a slightly different way by means of diplomatic posts or foreign culture centres. Naturally, in terms of quality, it is difficult to determine the potential of soft power and the scope of its influence generated by foreign culture cen- tres, but the very possibility of popularizing it, may serve as the evi- dence of a state’s and community’s power and will to interact. In diplomacy category a certain novelty is the adjective digital. The state that intends to generate a considerable number of soft 16 Introduction power resources must operate in a virtual sphere. Therefore, it is important to present the number of Internet users, which shows the influence through the net. It is happening although it poses a threat of being susceptible to the influence of others. Two other factors in this category are determined by the number of the Noble Peace Prize Winners and world leaders who authoritative magazines consider to be the most influential people in the world. Another category is social-political resource. This category takes into account the evaluation of a state’s functioning by means of its op- erational potential and execution of specific functions, transpa rency of regulations, political freedom and civil liberties, efficient govern- ment, effective and fair legal regulations, the degree of preventing corruption, free access to both traditional and electronic media. These elements, to a great degree, are aimed at demonstrating the scope of a state’s potential to engage in the process of generat- ing soft power, but they can be helpful in determining the scope of a community’s ability to operate, which thanks to its commitment can support soft power. Social-political category determines inter- nal policy to a great extent, however, its scope of operation is much broader. It is connected with the principle, which makes policy cred- ible, referring to the compliance of its internal and external profile. No other thing can be as effective as an example and clear rules: institutions-citizen. Next two categories are high culture and popular culture. In these categories the language, which is a factor determining understand- ing, plays the key role. The area of high culture is supported by the number of the Noble Prize winners in literature; the number of objects on the prestigious UNESCO list, which determines at- tractiveness of a state as for culture (monuments) and geographic environment. This factor may determine the part of resources which 17 Soft Power in Contemporary International Relations makes national heritage attractive to others. Museums are of similar character as they may serve as the evidence of the power of national heritage and they may also determine interest in a country in terms of tourism. An important sphere of popular culture is the scope of influence measured by the number of tourists. It may be a sign of mass in- teraction as tourists are, to a great extent, ambassadors of the state that they have got to know to some extent. Indirect power of at- traction is the beauty of landscapes, lifestyle, which may enhance attractiveness. Equally important for shaping soft power are mass events, espe- cially sports events. At this point it is necessary to take into account a state’s sports tradition, rivalry spirit, which translates into medal ranking and the choice of a discipline which is able to gather and engage a considerable part of the society. Therefore, football ranks first among the most prestigious sports disciplines. Football olym- pic games and championships including the most important mass events build the image and enable the state to demonstrate efficiency of its operation and community’s team spirit. Another group determining cultural influence is the cinema which on culture ranking list has been placed in two categories. They include films which have won awards at the most prestigious film festivals and their ability to influence does not necessarily translate into the size of the audience. In the popular category there are films the influence of which is reflected by the number of films produced by the national cin- ematography and the amount of box-office income. Similar can be said about music market data. The number of sold CDs certainly affects the perception of states’ culture or cultural circle. The rank- ing also takes into account export of cultural goods, which refers 18 Introduction to the products based on artistic design (e.g. jewellery), TV pro- grammes, licence fees, CD production. This factor may be slightly problematic as produced cultural goods do not have to be identified with the country of origin. Another category determining soft power is education. The in- fluence of this factor is determined by the ranking of higher edu- cation schools and foreigners who study there. Both factors reflect the net of relationships but they may also affect the behaviours of leaders. Educated foreigners become the subject of the influence and important investment for the future when they attain an appro- priate professional status in their country. Education category also includes think tanks as the institutions whose interaction may be crucial for state structures. Due to their international relations they are connected mainly with the scientific domain but they also constitute a form of influence in public diplo- macy. Yet, the majority have scientific character and should be taken into account in the educational sphere. In education category it is necessary to consider the world rank- ing of efficiency of elementary and secondary education. The main basis of the ranking is not the size of resources allocated to education (public and private), because it does not determine the actual level of education. Most important in this case is to define the efficiency of the educational system. The Nobel Prize winners make the rank- ing complete, in sciences and medicine in this case. The last category of soft power factors are these connected, to a great extent, with economy. In the book they are referred to as a social-economic category. An important factor defining this cat- egory constitutes great enterprises as they are able to have impact on the wealth of nations, generate great profits, create recognisable brands worldwide, which may affect building the state image. 19 Soft Power in Contemporary International Relations Another point in this category is the scale of innovation, which proves attractiveness of the administration model. An important factor is the extent of social justice, which strengthens community spirit, identification and most importantly, encourages to take mu- tual action in order to enhance the significance of the state. The level of social dissatisfaction which is also a factor generated by an economic indicator, reflects the level of social development. This level is determined by a long and prosperous life, which may lead to the (national) community’s interest in generating the power of the state. The last point in this category is the size of development aid which contributes greatly to creating the net of relationships and support among countries. It is certainly a very important mecha- nism of influence, determined, to a great extent, by economic fac- tors. Thanks to the aid provided to poorer countries, beneficiaries may feel grateful to their benefactors. Basic categories have been ranked and influence factors deter- mined in proportion to their meaning and their total number is strictly limited. In each category there are 30 best states. In practice it means that intensifying actions of state institutions and the nation in order to increase a factor in a given category may be monitored and connected with the growth or weakening of soft power. It may be an attempt to introduce changes in order to increase the signifi- cance of own status through soft power in a systematic way. In this arrangement of indicators, their choice in individual cat- egories may raise doubts. Some qualitative factors may not translate into influence, others are of purely subjective character and have not been taken into account in the ranking. Equally problematic is an enormous number of players in public diplomacy, which makes it difficult to determine which elements in individual categories are decisive. 20 Introduction Even if we assume that the choice raises no objections, it is clear that some elements of soft power cannot be evaluated. These are subjective elements, therefore, it is hard to determine their poten- tial of contributing to the success of the country. Presented index of countries with the highest indicator of soft power is a model ap- proach, requires updating, including changeable data and its inter- pretation in time. Supporters of soft power are often criticized as soft power is be- lieved to be vague. This view is far-fetched. One should bear in mind that soft power is a multi-dimensional phenomenon, has its dynam- ics and this is the reason why it is difficult to observe and capture how it affects attitudes and actions of countries and societies. Ignor- ing soft power is based on one-dimensional perception of power and wrong conviction that attracting others and stimulating emulation does not fit the category of power. Nevertheless, opponents may claim that the use of military power or economic pressure is a weak- ness whereas achieving the aim by attracting others and convincing them about the validity of own actions is a success. Soft power should not be overestimated at the expense of hard power as it is difficult to imagine functioning of a state without all elements of power. Soft power is certainly an important dimension of power and excluding it from the plans of states may lead to prob- lems with realizing its basic aims. 21
Pobierz darmowy fragment (pdf)

Gdzie kupić całą publikację:

Soft Power in Contemporary International Relations
Autor:

Opinie na temat publikacji:


Inne popularne pozycje z tej kategorii:


Czytaj również:


Prowadzisz stronę lub blog? Wstaw link do fragmentu tej książki i współpracuj z Cyfroteką: